Ultherapy vs. Injectables: Which Is Better For Getting Rid Of Wrinkles?

In the fight against wrinkles, both Ultherapy and injectables are excellent alternatives. However, each one has its pros and cons, so the choice will depend on your specific needs. So if you are considering Ultherapy vs injectables: and wondering which is better for getting rid of wrinkles, you need to take a closer look at what both treatments offer.


Ultherapy is a non-surgical facial rejuvenation treatment that uses ultrasound technology, to tighten and lift the skin. The focused ultrasound energy targets the foundation layers of the skin, and stimulates collagen production, in order to strengthen the skin and improve elasticity. Some improvement is seen immediately after treatment, but optimal results take 2-3 months.


Injectables such as botox and dermal fillers, are among the most requested anti-aging cosmetic solutions. Botox works by relaxing the muscles below the skin, and this reduces expression lines often seen on the forehead, and at the corner of the eyes. Dermal fillers fill out wrinkles in other parts of the face, and augment the cheeks.

Which Is Better For Getting Rid Of Wrinkles?

Ultherapy can restore fullness to the face and fill in wrinkles, because it treats the foundation layer of the skin. The results last 1-2 years, and it’s a non-invasive treatment.

Botox and dermal fillers are excellent alternatives for wrinkles, but they are minimally invasive, and require maintenance treatments every 4-6 months.

If you need to tighten loose skin and combat wrinkles, Ultherapy is the better option, but if wrinkles are your only concern, injectables may be all you need.

However, it is always best to seek the advice of a dermatologist or plastic surgeon, to determine what’s most appropriate for you.

Like this article?

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share on Pinterest